![]() In practice, most companies pay for someone to help test and debug their software. But they don’t.Īfter paying to test and debug their product for them, you’re still expected to pay full price for the release version. If they gave beta testers $20 off Longhorn when it’s released, you and I wouldn’t be having this poorly worded debate. Their stance is almost one of “Our next version of Windows will suck as much as previous versions unless you pay us to make it better”. Myself, I’ll take the broadband route if and when I opt to look at the beta of Longhorn, and I’ll put the $20 towards programmers who aren’t as financially well off as old Billy G and the boys. ![]() If you’re willing to pay $20 to run buggy, untested code, then more power to you. You and I obviously disagree about what makes sense here though. ![]() I agree it can be fun! And I agree that you should pay for quality software. it is price u pay to see longhorn features early, and i think it is very fun. $20 is nominal fee it is not like they are charging super duper amount. Much like you don’t get the idea of legible posts? Dude… Are you trying to be an 3l33t script kiddie or what? Turn down the volume on that Eminem and crack open a 3rd grade English book for gods sake. ![]() U r wrong ms get it u are the one who does not get it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |